Demo Synthetic data & decisions

Delivery dashboard

Good morning, Alexis.

A clear view of your projects. A short list of decisions.

Scenario snapshot · 28 October 2026
Contracted revenue£4mAcross 4 active projects
Forecast gross margin28%30% target
Forecast margin shortfall£80kAgainst target gross profit
View financial breakdown
Gross margin forecasts · synthetic example
ProjectRevenueTarget marginForecast margin
Aster integration£1m30%24%
Meridian controls£1m30%28%
Kestrel validation£1m30%30%
Solstice systems£1m30%30%

£1.2m target gross profit · £1.12m forecast gross profit. The £80k gap is not an estimate of recoverable savings.

Active projects 4

Choose a project to filter decisions

3 decisions need you

Evidence reviewed

Technical check open

Exposure estimates overlap project forecasts. Do not add them to the £80k shortfall.

3 / 3
Decision 3 · Aster integrationInvestigated brief

Give testing a clear owner.

Two records assign the same test scope to different teams. No approved handover connects them.

Systems accountable · v3 · 22 OctWorking plan
Software accountable · v2 · 2 OctApproved baseline

Shared scope: Aster H3 integration testing. A newer plan does not establish authority to change accountability.

Recommended · not yet a fact

Systems accountable · Software supporting

Systems coordinates the H3 test rig; Software provides interface checks. The supports this recommendation but does not approve it.

Why a director’s decision is needed

The is an approved baseline. The names a different team, without a recorded handover. The delegates changes to cross-team test accountability to the delivery director.

Without a decision, test readiness can fall between teams and delay acceptance. Ownership correction alone does not validate the H3 interface.

Software supports

Acting as Delivery director · simulated authority under the

How this decision updates the project
01 · Evidence2 conflicting recordsPlan ≠ approved matrix
02 · OwnershipUnresolvedDecision required
03 · IntegrationNo clear routeAcceptance risk still open
Evidence & authority 4 records · original assertions retained
Aster project planv3 · View excerpt

· Working project plan

Relevant excerpt

H3 integration testing: Systems accountable. Software to support interface validation. Acceptance evidence due 6 November.
Scope
Aster H3 integration testing
Authority
Planning record; no recorded approval of the changed accountability.
Supports
Names Systems for the revised integration work. Its newer date does not establish authority to replace the approved responsibility matrix.
Approved responsibility matrixv2 · View excerpt

· Approved governance record

Relevant excerpt

Integration testing: Software accountable; Systems consulted. Approved by the delivery director on 2 October.
Scope
Aster customer integration testing
Authority
Approved baseline; this version contains no H3-specific amendment.
Supports
Establishes the approved baseline assignment to Software. The later H3 plan routes the same work differently; these records expose the original accountability conflict.
H3 coordination noteMeeting note · 1 · View excerpt

· Conversational assertion

Relevant excerpt

Systems has the H3 test rig and is coordinating hardware readiness. Software can provide interface checks. Both leads requested a director decision on test accountability.
Scope
Aster H3 test readiness
Authority
Team discussion; not an accountability approval.
Supports
Makes Systems leadership a plausible recommendation because Systems coordinates the changed hardware and test rig. The note alone cannot confirm capacity or authorize accountability.
Aster delivery authority charterv1 · Approved · View excerpt

· Delegated decision authority

Relevant excerpt

The delivery director may confirm or amend cross-team test accountability within Aster delivery. Record the accountable team, supporting team, scope, and effective time. This authority does not waive acceptance criteria or authorize commercial scope changes.
Scope
Aster delivery organization
Authority
Delegates cross-team test accountability to the delivery director.
Supports
Authorizes the simulated director decision for this ownership conflict. This demonstration assumes that role; it does not implement authentication.
Working concept · Synthetic records and estimates